We have just seen that three separate domain names have been saved, all in single panel WIPO cases this week, The domain names and cases are below, It’s good seeing more cases being denied from a domain name investors perspective.

We often get called cybersquatters because we refuse to sell our digital real estate too cheap… I 100% understand when domain names are transferred for the correct reasons, where an obvious TM breach has occurred or someone is using a typo domain name for a phishing scam etc but too many domain names get lost to illegitimate WIPO cases IMO.

What do you think? Are domain name investors given a bad hand when it comes to WIPO cases?

Domain Name Case 1 – Access Spa

WIPO Case Number	D2020-1156
Domain name(s)	accessspa.com
Complainant	Philip Savino
Respondent	Peter Tsz-Man Chan, Cykon Technology Limited
Panelist	Rothnie, Warwick A.
Decision Date	26-06-2020
Decision	Complaint denied

Domain Name Case 2 – Nami Investment

WIPO Case Number	D2020-1097
Domain name(s)	nami-investment.com
Complainant	AEW SA
Respondent	Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o., Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Royal Europa Sp. z o.o.
Panelist	Blackmer, W. Scott
Decision Date	23-06-2020
Decision	Complaint denied

Domain Name Case 3 – Leak Testing Academy

WIPO Case Number	D2020-1000
Domain name(s)	leaktestingacademy.com
Complainant	Ateq
Respondent	Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot / Cyan Yo
Panelist	Swinson, John
Decision Date	23-06-2020
Decision	Complaint denied