WIPO domain disputes › RDNH findings › D2021-2768
D2021-2768: RDNH finding over idahomerealty.agency and 10 more
On 18 November 2021, a WIPO panel found that Idaho Home Realty LLC brought its complaint over idahomerealty.agency and 10 more in bad faith, the finding known as reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH). The complaint succeeded for some of the domain names and failed for the rest.
The record
| WIPO case | D2021-2768 |
|---|---|
| Domain names | idahomerealty.agencyidahomerealty.bizidahomerealty.comidahomerealty.expertidahomerealty.homesidahomerealty.infoidahomerealty.onlineidahomerealty.propertiesidahomerealty.realestateidahomerealty.rentalsidahomerealty.solutions |
| Complainant | Idaho Home Realty LLC |
| Decision date | 18 November 2021 |
| Outcome (WIPO) | Transfer, denied in part |
| How the finding appears | found in the panel's reasoning |
| Panelist | Nahitchevansky, Georges |
| Panel | Sole panelist |
| Complainant represented | Yes |
| Complaint filed | 24 August 2021 |
The panel’s finding
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names <idahomerealty.agency>, <idahomerealty.biz>, <idahomerealty.expert>, <idahomerealty.homes>, <idahomerealty.info>, <idahomerealty.online>, <idahomerealty.properties>, <idahomerealty.realestate>, <idahomerealty.rentals>, <idahomerealty.solutions> are transferred to Complainant: As to the disputed domain name <idahomerealty.com>, the Complaint is denied for the aforementioned reasons.
Accordingly the Panel finds that the Complainant has abused the administrative proceeding and engaged in RDNH with respect to the <idahomerealty.com> disputed domain name while recalling equally that Respondent has engaged in bad faith by registering the Additional Disputed Domain Names.
Read the decision on WIPO · WIPO case record
Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links (Dynadot and Spaceship). I may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through them. The WIPO links are not affiliate links.
How the RDNH archive is built
WIPO publishes every panel decision and a full-text search over them. This archive starts from that search for the wording a panel uses when it declares reverse domain name hijacking, reads each decision in full (older ones are web pages, newer ones PDFs converted to text), and keeps those where the panel itself says the complaint was brought in bad faith. A finding is marked declared in the operative decision when the final order says so, or found in the panel’s reasoning when only the reasoning does.
The reading is automatic and has been checked by hand on samples, but it is not exhaustive and not perfect: some findings may be missing, and a few listed cases may be borderline. A case is listed only when the panel’s own closing words can be quoted cleanly; decisions with an irregular layout, or not written in English, are held back. Every page links to the decision on WIPO, which is the authority. Dates, parties and panellists come from WIPO’s case records. Respondents are not named.
This is an information resource, not legal advice. A finding of RDNH is a panel’s conclusion about one complaint, not a statement about the company beyond that case.
