Skip to content

Robbie's Blog online since 2011 – Domain Names, Domain News, Domain Auctions & More…

We Love Domain Names, Branding, SEO & Affiliate Revenue Generation

Menu
  • Articles
  • Advertise on Robbies Blog – Learn More
  • GoDaddy Discount Codes
  • Contact Us
    • About
Menu

Academy Awards lawsuit against Godaddy.com

Posted on 25/10/2012

Academy Awards lawsuit against Godaddy.com

An article by the Hollywood Reporter, Is covering the story about the Academy Awards suing GoDaddy.com, I am sure I read this story sometime ago but it is being covered again as a judge in the case has wont grant them an order to speak with Google Legal Executive.

The case against GoDaddy.com by the The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) surrounds the parking of domain names after checking into some of the old links it would appear this case was started back in 2010.

The case was started with a 134-page lawsuit against domain registration giant GoDaddy.com and its subsidiaries for trafficking in unauthorized trademarks.

Suing under the Anti cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, the Academy disputes more than a 100 domain names, including 2011oscars.com, academyawardz.com, jaylenososcars.com, betacademyawards.com, oscarsunplugged.com, oscarshotels.com, oscarstravel.com, oscarsliveblogging.com … etc. Damages could total as much as $10 million.

AMPAS takes issue with the fact that GoDaddy customers are allowed to monetize domain names that are allegedly confusingly similar to its famous marks. Specifically, GoDaddy runs a “CashParking” program that allows users to buy a domain, “park” the page and collect a portion of revenue from GoDaddy’s advertising partners on a pay-per-click basis.

The Academy is demanding $100,000 in damages per domain name infringement so given the amount of domain names in contention, it could add up to more than $10 million.

Now what I want to know is if they win this case what does it mean for other parking companies i.e. VooDoo.com, ParkingCrew.com, Sedo.com, NameDrive.com, DomainSponsor.com, InternetTraffic.com etc.

Most of these service wont allow obviously typo and trademark domains to be parked with them but if the Academy Awards wins is this going to give the ammo needed to let other endusers not go directly after the squatters themselves but to actually go after the parking company?

You can read the latest article in full below about the judge blocking them from getting Google to speak about the matter.

A California federal judge won’t order Google to submit more documents and make available its executives in a legal fight over whether domain registrar giant GoDaddy facilitates the cybersquatting of trademarks related to the Academy Awards.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is currently suing GoDaddy over a program that allows users to buy a domain like oscarlist.com or oscarsliveblogging.com, “park” the page and collect advertising revenue. In this bitter legal dispute, AMPAS and GoDaddy don’t agree on much, but one thing they saw eye-to-eye on was the need to get more information from Google.

Unfortunately for both of them, U.S. magistrate judge Paul Grewal agrees with neither of them, ruling in a decision on Friday that a motion to compel discovery against Google would be burdensome on the search giant.

In the lawsuit, AMPAS will need to demonstrate a “bad faith intent to profit” from websites illegitimately registered.

AMPAS, which puts on the Oscars each year, asked that Google produce documents and be forced to sit for depositions so it could learn about implementation of Google Adsense in GoDaddy’s Parked Pages Program, methods for preventing trademark infringement, and revenue sharing between Google and GoDaddy, among other things.

Meanwhile, GoDaddy has been slowly building a defense that it cannot be liable under the Anti-Cybersquatting Protection Act because Google’s Adsense program is “solely responsible” for the profit intentions of cybersquatters.

One side wanted to peak under Google’s bed. The other side wanted to shake the bed. Thus, the investigation into Google was launched. Together, as the judge remarks, AMPAS and GoDaddy presented a “unified front” as Google cried foul.

Playing the referee, Judge Grewall says in his ruling, “AMPAS has not shown that the 4,000 pages of documents Google already produced does not provide the information it needs or why at least some of the additional discovery it wants was not obtained from GoDaddy or public sources.”

And as for GoDaddy’s own request, the judge won’t allow a fishing expedition.

“While the court is not persuaded by Google’s general tale of woe based on the more than 10,000 third-party discovery requests that it receives each year, AMPAS has not shown sufficient grounds here to justify subjecting Google to the additional burdens…”

Judge Grewall also agrees that GoDaddy “bargained away” an opportunity to make subpoena demands from Google in this dispute when it retained an attorney from the law firm Bryan Cave, who represents Google in other matters and had to attain a waiver to handle this case.

What are your thoughts on the case?

What will happen if the Academy Awards win?

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading…

1 thought on “Academy Awards lawsuit against Godaddy.com”

  1. Pingback: French registrar wins case against infringing domain registrations

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

I Love Domaining

I love domaining and support the domain industry

Register Your Domain with RobbiesBlog.com

Get The Best Deals on Domains – Click Below.
Cheapest Dot Com Registrations – $4.99* .COM Domains! Get going with GoDaddy!


Get a .com now from $4.99*/yr with GoDaddy!

Find the best domain names online with – GoDaddy Auctions: The smart choice for buying & selling domain names.

Did you miss these posts?

  • The Rationale for Showcasing Domains or Posting a Domain Reg of the Day…
  • AI In UDRP Proceedings
  • (Music Video) – Asphalt To Assets – Trucker Country – Domain Industry
  • .link – gTLD (Generic Top-Level domain)
  • .lgbt – gTLD (Generic Top-Level Domain)
  • Digging Into Numeric Domain Hacks
  • Are strong ccTLDs more attractive than most new gTLDs?
  • Opportunity Cost: What it Costs You When You Don’t Know the Market for a Domain
  • What Outbound Actually Taught Me: Lessons From My Own Sales, Not Theory
  • Do Marketplace Descriptions Actually Help Sell Domains?

Dynadot Expired Auctions




Affiliate Links

Robbies Blog – Contains Affiliate Links that feature through most posts and pages on our website, You won’t be charged any additional monies for visiting these links, we get paid a small commission should you decide to purchase an item via one of our links.

Thanks for supporting Robbies Blog – These links help keep us online.

More From Robbie's Blog

  • Advertise
  • About
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
©2026 Robbie's Blog online since 2011 – Domain Names, Domain News, Domain Auctions & More… | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
%d